Britain’s Daily Mail: U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria”

Another story from Global Research exposes a recent embarrassing mistake by the Daily Mail – they told the truth for once.

Britain’s Daily Mail: U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria”.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Britain’s Daily Mail: U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria”

  1. beetleypete

    Even the Daily Mail are exposing American lies. what next? We have to look behind the stories about Assad, and realise that the opposition would soon become a more dangerous enemy, if they won power with Western help. Regards, Pete.

    Reply
    1. sparaszczukster Post author

      I agree, Pete. Of course the CIA have been arming and training ‘terrorists’ all over the place since the Cold War. False flag operations are their forte. We are ruled by dangerous idiots.

      Reply
  2. beastrabban

    This is potentially extremely important, though it’s likely to get discarded out of hand as more ‘Troofer’ paranoia. Sections of the American Right have looked forward to the possibility of action against Assad’s regime for a long time, as they believe that Syria has been the conduit for arms from Iran going to the Palestinians for use against Israel. Others on the American Right have been unhappy at the prospect of action against Syria. They believe that if the US does arm the rebels against Assad, this will only result in the creation of yet another Sunni sharia state, similar to the Muslim Brotherhood’s regime in Egypt and similar governments in Tunisia and Libya. This section of American Right view the conflict in Syria as a proxy war between Iranian Shi’a Islam and Saudi-backed Sunni Muslims. They consider that, whatever side America chooses, it and democracy will be the loser.

    My guess is that there will, sometime this century, be another war in the Middle East in which Britain and the other western nations will be involved. It will be sold to us as a humanitarian actions, in which we will be defending innocent civilians or liberating the people for democracy, but really it’s going to be about oil. I’ve probably said the blindingly obvious here. Sorry for that. Greg Palast, in his book, ‘Armed Madhouse’, makes the case that Saddam Hussein was overthrown not for the reasons presented to the British and American public, but simply because his policies were destabilising the global price of oil. The other week I came across a book review in an old issue of ‘Lobster’, which argued that very soon there’s going to be a crash in the amount of oil coming out of Saudi Arabia. Apparently the estimate of the amount of oil the country has in reserve is massively inflated. If this occurs, then there’s going to be a war to secure the remaining available supplies. That’ll probably mean an invasion of Iran, and possibly places in the Maghreb like Libya or Algeria. And as the Iranians are developing their own nuclear weapons, this could very easily turn into the nightmare world of ‘Mad Max’. If we ain’t careful, the only remains of human civilisation will be Mel Gibson chasing gay biker gangs around the Australian outback.

    Reply
    1. sparaszczukster Post author

      According to a number of sources the fact that Assad’s troops took back the town of Qusair recently is crucual. Its on the border with Lebanon and is an important insurgent gateway into and out of Syria for arms and rebel fighters. Some have said that without control of Qusair the rebels have virtually lost the war.The same sources claim Assad is gaining popular support which now stands at around 70%. This is not good news for Obama etc. I have no way of knowing how true this all is though. Its very hard to ascertain truth from the confusion of accounts.

      Reply
  3. beetleypete

    I think Beast makes some good points in his comments, especially about Iran, who no doubt genuinely fear Western invasion, or attack. I am confused about this talk of the American ‘Right’ though, as in 61 years (well, maybe 45 years of actually looking for it), I have never found a trace of a ‘Left’ in the politics of that particular country!
    Regards to you both. Pete.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Sparaszczukster and Global Research: Did Britain Plan Chemical Weapon Attack in Syria | Beastrabban's Weblog

  5. Pingback: Secrets and Lies: The Real Reasons Obama and Cameron Want to Attack Syria | Beastrabban's Weblog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s